The person placing the posts was adamant that responsibility for vet’s bills incurred by beater’s dogs whilst working on shoots, should be the partial responsibility of the shoot.
I wrote about this topic in another blog last November and it is an interesting subject.
Are all shoots wealthy?
What particularly struck me was the misconception, implicit in this post, that all shoots, even the majority of shoots, are profit making. I have a hunch that most are probably more like our own, where we are very lucky to break even at the end of the season. And sometimes even end up out of pocket.
Working for money
There are obviously some that go beating for money, and see it as a paid job. And for them, it is probably important that the shoot they beat on is sufficiently wealthy to be able to support their beaters financially when things go wrong.[wp_ad_camp_1]But I suspect the vast majority of people who go beating, do it as I do, purely as a hobby, and are happy if their ‘expenses’ are enough to cover their travel costs.
It is worth bearing in mind that there is probably not a shoot in the country that could afford to pay beaters a legitimate ‘wage’ – that is to say, an amount that is legally above the minimum wage of over £6 per hour.
Therefore beaters are not actually employees. But more ‘volunteers’ who get expenses.
Payment in kind
On our own shoot we do not pay beaters at all, and there is no doubt that they come beating as a hobby, to see old friends, work their dogs, and keep fit.
But they are much appreciated and our guns treat them to a good lunch in the local pub at the end of each shoot day. And we return their kindness with several days of free rough shooting and pigeon shooting on the estate. I am sure we are not the only ones.
There is a huge variety in the types of shoot that exists in the UK, from the wealthiest estates with hundreds of birds shot per day, through smaller commercial shoots, to privately run non-profit shoots like our own, right down to the smallest syndicates where everyone ‘mucks in’ and provides their labour free of charge.
Is it fair?
To some it might seem unfair that they have to pay their own vet bills, when their dog is hurt on a shoot, something which I should add, is a fairly unusual event. The problem is, if we have an attitude of being ‘owed’ something, or trying to make things ‘fair’, it can sometimes end up killing the very thing that we enjoy and spoiling it for everyone.
It would a shame indeed if legislation and/or demands for ‘free perks’ led to the demise of these smaller shoots that could not even afford to replace beater’s clothing when it gets damaged, much less provide free veterinary treatment for beaters dogs.
I feel sure that on most shoots, if a dog was hurt and needed expensive veterinary treatment, and if this was likely to cause hardship to his owner, the guns would offer to help out. I also feel that this would be more of a generous gesture and a privilege rather than a right.
What do you think? Do you beat for pleasure or for money? Do you see your pay as wages or expenses? And who do you think should pay for dogs injured on a shoot? Drop your thoughts into the comments box
If you enjoy my articles, you might like my new book: The Happy Puppy Handbook – a definitive guide to early puppy care and training.